About 40 drug makers, including Eli Lilly Company, Johnson Johnson and Pfizer, have signed on to the code.
The industry associations have to upload the Uniform Code on their websites and will be responsible for informing its members, and the government in case of violations.
The council in exercise of its statutory powers amended the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 (the regulations) on imposing a prohibition on the medical practitioner and their professional associations from taking any Gift, Travel facility, Hospitality, Cash or monetary grant.50,000/-: Removal from Indian Medical Register or State Medical Register for 6 (six) months.Iv) Most importantly, it was pointed out that MCI guidelines and amendment therein are meant only for the medical practitioners and not to Pharmaceutical or allied health care companies.This important distinction has to be kept in mind that regulation issued by Medical Council of India is qua the doctors/medical practitioners and not for the pharmaceutical companies.5,000/ -: Censure Expenses for travel facilities more than.Its plea however, is that it has not passed any order against the Petitioner hospital therefore; the Petitioner cannot have any grievance against the impugned.
CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance.22,99,72,607/ being freebies given by the assessee to doctors, ignoring the fact that such payments are specifically prohibited.e.f.
CIT DR that cbdt is well empowered to issue such clarification, it is seen that the cbdt Circular dated (supra) in its clarification has enlarged the scope and applicability of Indian Medical Council Regulation 2002 by making it applicable to the pharmaceutical companies or allied.
Free samples are given of smaller size, wherein it is marked as physician sample not for sale.From the aforesaid notification,.The regulation of 2002 issued by the Medical Council of India (supra provides limitation/curb/prohibition for medical practitioners only and not for pharmaceutical companies.Cbdt (supra learned CIT(A) concluded that the assessee has to satisfy raffles medical center the AO that the expenses is not in violation of MCI Regulation, which the assessee in this case has been able to do so and there is no prohibition on the Pharma companies under.Nowhere the regulation or the notification mentions that such a regulation or code of conduct will cover pharmaceutical companies or health care sector in any manner.Circular.5 of 2012 (supra wherein the cbdt has referred to amendment to the Indian Medical Council Regulations, 2002, brought from, imposing prohibition of medical practitioner and their professional associations from taking any gift, travel facility, hospitality, cash or monetary grant from the pharmaceutical and.It says "in any seminar, conference or meeting cq contest rules organized by a pharma company for promoting a drug or disseminating information, if a medical practitioner participates as a delegate, it will be on his/her own cost.".Unless the pharmaceutical companies make aware of such kind of products to key doctors or medical practitioners, then only it can successfully launch its products/medicines.II, dated It has been brought to the notice of the Board that some pharmaceutical and allied health sector Industries are providing freebees (freebies) to medical practitioners and their professional associations in violation of the regulations issued by Medical Council of India (the Council) which.